Really in the first I have faced some confusion about my actual role in my career.
At the first I have conduct very systematic testing activities followed & monitored by processes.
By the time I have faced some cases which enforcing me to do some penetration testing which from my own perspective conducted by some non sequential scenarios .
So , I get used in my working characterizes to do that role,
At the beginning , I interested to walking through the application & determine what the testing were be fitted to that application.
Actually , after my smallest experience I decide to use the both techniques in my testing activities .
The first one is Following all processes till making sure from all basic requirement .
The second was to do some penetration testing which make me able to do some activities :
1-present some enhancement for the Client requirement,
2-detect all available vulnerabilities which maybe not detected by the traditional techniques.
3-make some rapid application development.
4-becoming have some creditability with the developer side.
Certainly I decide to use that way of testing which I feel that very fitted to my characterizes.
But , I can’t tell other people about what I do & the QCs still answered why I becoming have some creditability with the developers & PM.
The main reason was I have Combined between two techniques of testing Agile testing & CMMI traditional process.
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Sunday, November 11, 2007
Customizable Fatwa & only for blind people
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Quality or Code is the heart of the product
I think the quality is the heart of the product are u agree with me .
As well as I think the Code is the brain of the product.
Quality is the sensor that if u wants to take a decision about what is the product status now can we deliver or in another mean can we release or not.
Can u ask the same question to the code ethics, I don’t think saw.
In another way can the code make effective conversation with you without quality?
For example, call function & say give me specific record stated in DB where the user answers right.
The code know what u want well but he can’t response your request till asking the heart , can we give him that , then he say it’s ok the stored procedures is working well give him what he want.
Ok, the code processing, it’s ok the user is XX you said thank u .
You asked the code again can you raise that user balance by one, thinking &then asking his heart ,can our stored procedure do that ,the heart is pulsate then he say that’s ok the function is very well go ahead to give him what he want, the code respond you & say the user’s balance is raised correctly , do u want anything else, you with happiness behavior say , no thanks.
Can u expect what will happen if we excluded the Code from our story.
As well as I think the Code is the brain of the product.
Quality is the sensor that if u wants to take a decision about what is the product status now can we deliver or in another mean can we release or not.
Can u ask the same question to the code ethics, I don’t think saw.
In another way can the code make effective conversation with you without quality?
For example, call function & say give me specific record stated in DB where the user answers right.
The code know what u want well but he can’t response your request till asking the heart , can we give him that , then he say it’s ok the stored procedures is working well give him what he want.
Ok, the code processing, it’s ok the user is XX you said thank u .
You asked the code again can you raise that user balance by one, thinking &then asking his heart ,can our stored procedure do that ,the heart is pulsate then he say that’s ok the function is very well go ahead to give him what he want, the code respond you & say the user’s balance is raised correctly , do u want anything else, you with happiness behavior say , no thanks.
Can u expect what will happen if we excluded the Code from our story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)